Sprawling south Lake community rejected
But the county may reconsider the project this summer after updating its plan
for growth.
Robert Sargent | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted May 31, 2006
TAVARES -- The Lake County Commission on Tuesday turned down a community of
5,200 homes that could have opened up a vast stretch of rural pastures and
groves to heavy growth spilling over from other Central Florida counties.
The 5-0 vote followed a nearly seven-hour meeting that saw dozens of local
residents and government officials pack the County Commission chambers to offer
impassioned arguments against the sprawling Karlton community.
It was the first big development in recent history that did not win
county approval.
But the battle concerning the 2,000-acre project isn't over.
County commissioners decided not to send the Karlton proposal to state planners
for further review. However, they told the West Palm Beach-based Karl Corp. that
it could come back with its request this summer after the county updates its
comprehensive-development plan that serves as a blueprint for growth.
Among the biggest concerns of those opposed to the project are what it would
mean to traffic-packed roads, Lake's dwindling rural lifestyle and the need for
more schools.
"I don't think people understand the gravity of the problem, and I don't
think you [commissioners] are going to understand it," said Lake School
Board Chairman Jimmy Conner, in a passionate request to stop Karlton.
"We are so far behind [with building schools], it could take years to catch
up."
The proposed Karlton site is south of Clermont and east of Lake Louisa on a
rural piece of land just inside Lake and west of Orange's massive Horizon West
community, proposed to accommodate 40,000 residential units.
Clermont resident Choice Edwards cautioned Lake commissioners about rushing to
approve new growth.
"I believe this has been too little, too late for something too big, too
soon," he said.
Lake is the 21st-fastest-growing county in the country, with nearly 280,000
residents and about 470,000 projected by 2025.
The county currently is overhauling its comprehensive plan. But the state
Department of Community Affairs recently told Lake officials that, beginning
July 1, they cannot approve any more changes to the current plan in order to
accommodate big developments such as Karlton until the update is completed.
Commissioners originally seemed split on Karlton.
Bob Pool, who represents south Lake, initially praised the development:
"It's not easy, it's not fun, but somebody has to have a vision for the
future," he told the audience.
But then Pool did a dramatic turnaround when he realized Karlton did not have a
majority of votes. Pool later said he changed his position on the large
development to avoid dissension on the County Commission.
Chairwoman Catherine Hanson said the Karlton plans need more work and that the
county should do an areawide study for development in that portion of south
Lake.
Commissioners Welton Cadwell and Jennifer Hill both said the project was too
soon while Lake is redoing its comprehensive plan.
"The timing of this project concerns me more than anything else,"
Cadwell said.
Commissioner Debbie Stivender had positive comments about Karlton, saying that
"it is a community that helps take care of itself."
Karlton had become the target of enormous protest from south Lake residents
lobbying to slow the rapid pace of growth through the rural areas once dominated
by citrus trees and cattle pastures.
Debate about growth has been building for several years as the county
and cities approve different residential projects to bring thousands more homes.
Many schools are overcrowded, and school leaders lack money to build new
facilities. Traffic also is a problem in south Lake, where State Road 50 and
U.S. Highway 27 handle most of the vehicles.
Karlton proposed a $36 million roadway, the Karl Kahlert Parkway, to provide a
four-lane route connecting Orange and Lake counties from U.S. 27 south of
Clermont to S.R. 429, which cuts through Horizon West.
Representatives for Karlton also proposed to find funding -- possibly from a
special tax district -- to build elementary and middle schools.
"Schools -- if we don't build them, we won't be building the houses,"
said land-use attorney Steve Richey, who was representing the developer.
Karlton's plans call for 5,211 homes -- about half restricted to owners 50 and
older -- as well as a 100-acre medical campus.
Karlton could be completed in 10 years with more than 12,000 new residents -- a
population larger than most cities currently in Lake County.
Robert Sargent can be reached at rsargent@orlandosentinel.com or
352-742-5909.
Manatees endangered no more?
The state's fish and wildlife commission is poised to take the sea mammal
off the endangered species list next week.
By CRAIG PITTMAN, Times Staff Writer
Published May 31, 2006
For five years, boating advocates angry about restrictions on their hobby
have pushed state officials to take manatees off the endangered species list.
Next week, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is poised to
do just that. But the commission's executive director said Tuesday that it will
not lead to a rollback of boating restrictions.
Boating advocates expecting fewer regulations "are going to be
disappointed by the end result,'' executive director Ken Haddad warned during a
meeting with the St. Petersburg Times editorial board. "It doesn't mean we
go in and start removing speed zones.''
But environmental advocates worry that state legislators will weaken manatee
protections "using the theory that they're doing so much better that we
don't need to protect them so much,'' said Pat Rose of the Save the Manatee
Club.
An estimated 3,000 manatees swim in Florida's waterways. Computer models have
found no chance that the species will go extinct in the next century, but the
population could decline by at least 50 percent over the next 45 years.
That doesn't qualify the manatee as endangered under new criteria that state
wildlife officials adopted recently. Instead, it fits the "threatened"
designation.
Haddad and his staff are meeting with newspaper editorial writers around
Florida this week as part of an unusual publicity campaign by the agency to deal
with the expected controversy over reclassifying the manatee, a license-plate
icon that Gov. Jeb Bush once declared "my favorite mammal.''
Yet no matter what the commission decides, Haddad's staff predicts that
speeding boats will continue to cause a quarter of all documented manatee deaths
each year.
"It's always been 25 percent, and we assume it will continue to be 25
percent,'' said Elsa Haubold, leader of the agency's species conservation
planning section.
To boating activists such as Tom McGill of Citizens for Florida's Waterways,
that means manatee regulations aren't working and ought to be changed.
"If they really want to be reasonable,'' he said, "they ought to
take a lot of these slow speed zones and put a higher speed channel in the
middle of it.''
Manatees were placed on the earliest endangered species list in 1967. Federal
officials are reassessing the manatee's endangered status and hope to finish
later this year.
Boat hulls and keels crack manatees' skulls and ribs, while the propellers
slice their skin. Meanwhile, waterfront homes and marinas line the estuaries,
rivers and springs where they once found refuge.
Boat ownership has continued to boom in Florida, hitting an all-time high in
2004 of more than 980,000 registered watercraft.
Last year, 80 of the 396 manatees that died were killed by boats, and an
estimated two-thirds of all adult manatees carry scars from boats.
Six years ago, a coalition of environmental and animal welfare groups sued
the state and federal governments, arguing both had violated the Endangered
Species Act by failing to protect manatees from boats. Settling the lawsuits
resulted in extensive new restrictions on boating and development, which led to
a political backlash
"We're getting people that hate the manatee now,'' Haddad said.
"That was unheard of 15 years ago.'' He compared it to "a kind of a
little disease that starts to spread. ... Then the politicians get involved.''
When aerial surveys counted the most manatees in 30 years, boating activists
petitioned the commission to reclassify manatees.
"There are a lot of people who feel there are way too many
manatees," state wildlife commissioner Richard Corbett, a Tampa mall
developer, said in 2004.
The commission is currently chaired by Rodney Barreto, a Miami lobbyist whose
firm once represented a condo developer fighting manatee rules that prevented
him from building a dock.
Besides downgrading manatees, Haddad is also recommending that the commission
vote to upgrade gopher tortoises from a "species of special concern'' to a
"threatened'' species. However, he could not say exactly how his agency
would step up protection of the tortoise. Currently, developers can simply pave
over their burrows after writing a check to the state.
"We're realists. We know you just can't stop development,'' Haddad said.
"If we just said you can't touch gopher tortoises from here on out, then
virtually all the developable land in Florida would be off-limits.''
Plans In Works to Raise, Clean Lake Hancock
By Tom
Palmer
The Ledger
LAKELAND -- Lakeland engineer Bob Hayes will locate a pair of plants designed to
improve water quality in Lake Hancock on a private ranch on the northern edge of
the lake, he announced Tuesday.
Hayes plans two plants. One will turn the estimated 4.5 million tons of muck on
the bottom of the 4,519-acre lake into fertilizer. The second will clean water
flowing into the lake via Saddle Creek.
Lake Hancock, which sits at the headwaters of the Peace River, is one of the
most polluted lakes in Florida and is the main contributor to poor water quality
in the river.
The plant will be located on a ranch owned by Lynn and Leigh Hampton.
Hayes and the Hamptons reached a "meeting of the minds" last week,
said Keith Wadsworth, the Hamptons' lawyer.
He called it a "preliminary arrangement," explaining there are
unresolved details such as defining exactly which piece of property will be
involved and the operating time frame for the project.
Hayes said he is pursuing permits for the plant. He will need a zoning permit
from the Polk County Planning Commission and various environmental permits from
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
He said he expects to be ready to break ground by next summer.
Hayes estimates the operation will last six years.
Meanwhile, Swiftmud officials are still working out the final details with Polk
County on plans to raise the lake's level to store water to replenish the Peace
River during droughts to maintain river flow as required by state law.
The key document is a memorandum of agreement, which is expected to come before
Swiftmud's Governing Board next month, said Mark Hammond, Swiftmud's director of
resource management.
Swiftmud's talks with Polk County mainly deal with the effect of any lake-level
rise on the North Central Landfill, which is east of Saddle Creek and a short
distance north of the lake.
If Swiftmud and Polk County can work out an agreement, Hammond said the next
step will be to submit the project to the DEP for review to see whether the
agency will issue a permit for the work. He expects an answer by January.
Hammond said if DEP gives them the initial go-ahead on the permits, he will go
back to Swiftmud's Governing Board to get a decision on whether to go ahead and
raise the lake and buy a number of homes along the lake and Saddle Creek that
would be flooded by the new lake level.
He said Swiftmud officials are still working on a plan to filter water flowing
out of the lake to reduce pollution flowing into the river, which serves as a
drinking water source in downstream coastal areas.
Swiftmud officials purchased land and set a plan in motion to treat the water
before Hayes announced his project.
Hammond said Hayes' project could be a potential benefit to Swiftmud's goals.
"If he can get rid of the muck at no cost to the taxpayers, we're
supportive," he said.
Tom Palmer can be reached at
tom.palmer@theledger.com
or 863-802-7535.
Office complex clears hurdle
If built, the development at Suncoast Parkway and State Road 54 would be
larger than Tampa's Bank of America tower. Swiftmud's permit approval puts
it one step closer to reality.
By CHUIN-WEI YAP
Published May 31, 2006
TAMPA - The Southwest Florida Water Management District's governing board
paved the way Tuesday for a 1.2-million-square-foot office complex at the
Suncoast Parkway and State Road 54 that would eclipse Tampa's Bank of America
tower in square footage.
The vote approved a permit for a developer's pond excavation plans.
If built, the complex would be larger than the 800,000-square-foot downtown
Tampa tower. It would sit across from NorthPointe office park, already home to
Opinicus, a flight simulator outfit that hopes to eventually employ about 200.
The office complex is at the heart of an evolving proposal on how to use a
prime corner of Pasco real estate that began as Westfield Homes' purely
residential Ashley Glen but now includes a pitch for the office complex.
Tuesday's ruling deals a blow to Dr. Octavio Blanco, a neighbor of
Westfield's 266-acre project.
In the past two years, Blanco has sued twice to block the developer from
digging a 40-acre, 25-foot-deep pit next to his 100-acre property. He won a
delay on the first lawsuit, but lost the second, on which Swiftmud based
Tuesday's ruling.
Blanco vowed to file an appeal today against the Swiftmud ruling, hoping
still to stop the excavation.
One of the most ambitious projects in Pasco's developmental history could
hinge on the outcome.
For at least a year, Westfield has been under contract to sell the property
to Doug Weiland of JES Properties, a Clearwater spinal
surgeon-turned-developer.
The plan was to have Weiland enlist other developers and enlarge the
project to include office and industrial space. Earlier plans proposed 340,000
square feet of retail and 800 residences.
Alabama's Colonial Properties, a $5.6-billion, New York Stock
Exchange-listed investment trust with expertise in mixed-use projects, is said
to be one developer interested in the project.
Blanco shared site plans Tuesday that showed three proposed eight-story
office towers with 230,400 square feet each.
The balance of the square footage would be built on 20 additional acres
that Weiland wants to buy from Blanco, to enhance the visibility of the towers
from the Suncoast Parkway, Blanco said. Blanco's property is closer to the
parkway than the Westfield-Weiland project is.
Blanco doesn't object to the project but wants assurances that his wetlands
would not be affected, he said. He may yet ink a deal with Weiland to secure
those assurances regardless of which developer eventually takes over the
project, he said.
"Pasco's long-term economic future is hopeless if you don't bring in
jobs," he said. He also wants a say in the kind of companies - preferably
Fortune 100 employers, he said - that are wooed into the office complex.
Weiland already has paid at least $35,000 in "development of regional
impact" application fees for the project, according to officials at the
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. These applications are required for
developments beyond 2,000 homes or 400,000 square feet of office space.
Tuesday's ruling appears to remove one of the last remaining hurdles to
Westfield's sale to Weiland.
Asked why Westfield Homes elected to pursue the permit despite its contract
to sell, Westfield attorney David Smolker said, "Can you assure me that
Weiland would buy?"
Weiland did not reply to numerous calls for comment.
Westfield's sand pit would provide fill for the nascent development and
serve as a future amenity, according to Smolker.
But Blanco, a veterinarian, sued twice because he believes the pit would
drain his wetlands. He won the first round in January, when administrative law
judge David Maloney said Westfield had not done enough to determine the impact
on wetlands.
But the developer returned, armed with studies, for its second shot at the
permit.
In April, administrative law judge T. Kent Wetherell II sided with
Westfield.
Blanco sued again, questioning Westfield's methodology and the timing of
its studies; he likened it to analyzing school attendance rates on Memorial
Day.
On Tuesday, Swiftmud's board took seconds to dismiss his objections,
cutting him off at the 10-minute limit and voting unanimously to let Westfield
proceed.
To some extent, Swiftmud's board members were bound by a warning from the
agency's general counsel, Bill Bilenky, that they could not change the
judicial findings of fact.
Deputy general counsel Jack Pepper recommended in Westfield's favor, and
threw doubt on the hydrology and hydrogeology experts that Blanco had deployed
in his first judicial hearing.
Blanco hopes the threat of an appellate court fight will persuade Weiland
to come to terms on protecting the wetlands, which take up about half his
property.
"It could be a long, nasty fight," he said. "Weiland knows
that. He doesn't want to fight me."
Chuin-Wei Yap covers growth and development in Pasco County. He can be
reached at 813909-4613, or e-mail cyap@sptimes.com.
Builder Cleared To Dig Lake
By KEVIN WIATROWSKI kwiatrowski@tampatrib.com
Published: May 31, 2006
LAND - O' LAKES - Pasco County veterinarian Octavio Blanco lost another
round in his fight with developer Westfield Homes on Tuesday, but he promised
to continue to try to thwart Westfield's efforts to build its Ashley Glen
project.
The Blanco family's former dairy farm is sandwiched between the eastern
edge of the Suncoast Parkway and Westfield's 260-acre tract on the north side
of State Road 54. Although Blanco lives in Lutz, his mother still lives and
raises cattle on the 100-acre farm.
Tuesday's ruling by the Southwest Florida Water Management District cleared
Westfield Homes to dig a lake on its property. The lake will contain storm
runoff from the development.
Sand from the excavation will be used to fill the site for homes and
commercial development, said Westfield attorney David Smolker.
Blanco says excavating the lake will lower local water levels and damage
the large cypress wetland that straddles his and Westfield's property.
Westfield has said its research disputes that claim.
The builder said it will harm a single acre of the 71 wetland acres on its
land.
Smolker told the district that Westfield's research showed the project
might improve the health of the wetlands by shunting its overflow into the
cypress head during heavy rains.
After the hearing, Blanco said he will seek an injunction to block
Westfield from digging on its land. He intends to appeal the district's
decision to the 2nd District Court of Appeal in Lakeland.
The project's Development of Regional Impact application remains under
review by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council with no expected approval
date, said the council's DRI reviewer John Meyer. A DRI is a project large
enough to affect the populations of two counties.
Westfield intends to build 807 homes, 450,000 square feet of retail space
and 800,000 square feet of office space on its property.
Westfield filed its original permit request with the district in late 2002.
Blanco challenged it in 2003 and continued to fight it at two hearings by the
state Division of Administrative Hearings over three years.
On April 10, an administrative law judge in Tallahassee ruled that
Westfield had met all of the district's requirements and ordered the agency to
issue a development permit. Blanco objected all the way to the district's
governing board meeting Tuesday in Tampa.
"We need to make sure everything is looked at," Blanco told the
board, "because this change is permanent."
Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at (813) 948-4201.
City To Discuss Settling Lawsuit With Developers
Published: May 30, 2006
The city council will huddle behind closed doors tonight to discuss a
possible settlement of a lawsuit filed by the developers of Rocky Creek
Estates.
Council members are slated to consider the proposal in executive session at
5 p.m. at city hall on Ridge Road.
Two years ago, Altamonte G&M sued after the council approved a
scaled-down version of the project on environmentally sensitive land near the
Gulf of Mexico.
Following a contentious meeting Oct. 26, the council agreed to 13 homes for
the development, rather than the 43 the city's planning and zoning board
approved.
The homes are to be built on 13.5 acres near Limestone Drive, Sunset
Boulevard and Ebbtide Drive.
An additional 27 acres of wetlands are set aside for preservation.
This month, the city's law firm, Dunedin-based Frazer, Hubbard, Brandt,
Trask & Yacavone, approached the development group with a proposal to
settle the lawsuit.
Altamonte G&M has plans for a second development near Rocky Creek,
including an 80-unit hotel with a rooftop restaurant and a 40-slip marina.
Christian M. Wade
Weeki Wachee, Swiftmud await DEP verdict
By MORGAN C. MOELLER
mmoeller@hernandotoday.com
TAMPA — It’s now a game of wait and see.
After a few years of litigation, mediation, and stubborn determination from
both parties, Weeki Wachee Springs and its landlord, the Southwest Florida
Water Management District (Swiftmud), are once again stalled in their ongoing
disagreement.
At a meeting Tuesday, Swiftmud board members were given an update on the
latest between the quarreling entities. At this point, the district will wait
and see what happens between Weeki Wachee Springs and the Department of
Environmental Protection before pursuing the issue further in court, Michael
Molligan, spokesperson for Swiftmud, said after the meeting.
Swiftmud filed papers two weeks ago to cease mediation and head back to
court. After several attempts at resolving outstanding disagreements over
Swiftmud’s new, proposed lease, there was just one issue left on the table:
Is Weeki Wachee required to obtain a submerged sovereign land lease for its
use of the spring?
Neither party would budge.
Weeki Wachee officials said they are not required to have one under their
current lease, adding that Swiftmud should be the responsible party. Swiftmud
representatives said they talked to DEP and Weeki Wachee is responsible.
Meanwhile, Weeki Wachee Springs’ attorneys were contacted on May 15 by
DEP requesting they revisit that issue, which was apparently addressed in a
letter to the attraction on Aug. 29, 2005.
The latest DEP letter said the issue is “unresolved” and that they
would like to try and reach a resolution.
John Athanason, marketing director for Weeki Wachee Springs, said he could
not locate the 2005 letter. Weeki Wachee has yet to respond to the most recent
request.
Athanason said the response would likely be similar to the letter they sent
DEP after receiving the first letter: It’s not our responsibility.
DEP representative Anthony De Luise said the lease has always been
necessary and that the attraction is responsible for the lease. He said DEP
requires the attraction to obtain a lease to continue operations.
Reporter Morgan Moeller can be contacted at (352) 544-5229.
Sprawl Outruns Arizona's Biosphere
ORACLE, Ariz.
IN 1991, eight researchers in dark blue Star Trek-style uniforms entered
Biosphere 2 — a vast terrarium in the Arizona desert north of Tucson —
hoping to spend two years inside without importing food, water or even air.
The goal was to see whether the sealed environment, considered a microcosm of
the Earth's, could become self-sustaining.
As it turns out, the real science experiment was going on outside, as
development conquered vast swaths of the Sonoran Desert. The Biosphere, miles
from nowhere when it was built in the 1980's, is now within the reach of a
building boom streaking north from Tucson and south from Phoenix (and which
some demographers say will eventually join the two cities, once 100 miles
apart).
The Biosphere was designed to simulate the Earth's environment. By
succumbing to sprawl, it may have done just that.
After spending a reported $200 million on the Biosphere, the Texas oil heir
Ed Bass is about to sell the building and its surrounding 1,658 acres to
Fairfield Homes of Tucson.
Richard Foerster of Tucson Realty & Trust, a veteran broker in the
area, estimated to be worth about $25,000 an acre, or $40 million. At that
price, Mr. Bass would be losing at least $160 million.
Martin Bowen, the president of Decisions Investments, a holding company
controlled by Mr. Bass, said that there were "ongoing discussions"
with Fairfield Homes about ways to save the three-acre Biosphere building, and
that Mr. Bass would "prefer that it be used for the purpose it was built
for."
But, Mr. Bowen said, Mr. Bass's contract with Fairfield does not require
the buyer to preserve the structure. That means, he said, that "when the
deal closes, probably later this year, our options for saving the Biosphere
will be over."
It could be replaced by a housing development called Biosphere Estates. In
January, Fairfield registered that name and a number of variants with the
State of Arizona.
David Williamson, the president of Fairfield, said only that the deal is
"in escrow," and that he would not comment on plans for the site.
If Biosphere Estates is built, it will join dozens of other new
developments in Pinal County, including SaddleBrooke Resort, an upscale
retirement development just south of the Biosphere property.
Last year, there were nearly 19,000 building permits issued for new houses
in the county, triple the number in 2003, according to Paul Larkin, the
county's tax assessor.
"And that's just the tip of the iceberg," he said. "Driving
in to work this morning, I took a different route, and I saw two new
subdivisions that I didn't know existed."
The population of Pinal (rhymes with canal) County, currently about
250,000, will probably reach one million by about 2020, said Elliott D.
Pollack, an economist and real estate analyst based in Scottsdale, Ariz.
"The growth is coming from Tucson in the south and Phoenix in the
north," he said. "Pinal is where the available land is."
Twenty years ago, Mr. Bass chose the Biosphere site, in the town of Oracle,
because of its remoteness at the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains. The
goal was to bring in groups of "bionauts" for two years at a time
for 100 years.
But during the first two-year mission that began in 1991, the Biosphere was
beset by one problem after another: Oxygen dwindled, and the sea became
acidic. Crops failed, causing the bionauts to lose weight rapidly, while ants
and other insects thrived.
Biosphere administrators later admitted that they had secretly pumped
600,000 cubic feet of fresh air into the Biosphere, supplemented the bionauts'
home-grown diet with stored food and smuggled in emergency supplies. Then, two
bionauts were arrested for breaking the Biosphere's seals. Soon the 100-year
experiment was abandoned, and the Biosphere was reopened as a tourist site.
Visitors were now allowed inside, where the sights include 3,800 species of
plants and a million-gallon sea.
Joaquin Ruiz, the dean of the College of Science at the University of
Arizona in Tucson, said that because of its size, the Biosphere is "an
important instrument."
Dr. Ruiz participated in a conference at the National Academy of Sciences
in Washington in March 2005 to determine whether the Biosphere could still
serve a useful function.
"The consensus was that it could," Dr. Ruiz said. "It is
indeed an enormous terrarium, but the scaling of that terrarium allows you do
to large-scale ecology experiments that cannot be done anywhere else."
For example, he said, the Biosphere could be used to simulate the effects of
the loss of small amounts of moisture in a desert, helping scientists
understand the effects of a drought.
Now it looks as if those experiments will never happen.
On a recent Friday, traffic was bumper to bumper on Oracle Road, outside
the entrance to the Biosphere grounds. Roads were torn up, as construction
crews dug trenches for water mains to serve the growing population. But at the
Biosphere, there were about 10 cars in the parking lot and about that many
people in the visitor center.
"Clearly, you can't run it as a tourist attraction," said Mr.
Bowen, the president of Decisions. "It's too expensive to maintain."
(According to a sales brochure for the Biosphere property, Mr. Bass has spent
$18 million on maintenance and another $9 million on major improvements in the
last eight years.)
Because of the investment and maintenance costs, "you can't just keep
it sitting empty," Mr. Bowen said.
He compared the Biosphere with the Spruce Goose, the giant plane built by
Howard Hughes. "That's a good analogy," Mr. Bowen said. "The
Spruce Goose is a fantastic aircraft, but what good is it sitting in a
hangar?"
Mr. Bass, who is 60, was not available to answer questions. His
spokeswoman, Terrell Lamb, said that Mr. Bass still considers the Biosphere
"a unique apparatus for the study of ecological science."
Mr. Bass, who serves on the boards of the New York Botanical Garden and the
World Wildlife Fund, has made efforts to save the Biosphere. In 1995, his
company brought in the Earth Institute, a respected environmental program at Columbia
University, to operate the site. But the partnership unraveled, and
Decisions ended up suing Columbia for breach of contract. The lawsuit was
settled in September 2003, and Columbia ended its involvement that December.
Soon thereafter, Mr. Bass directed CB Richard Ellis to sell the 140 acres
at the center of the site, where the Biosphere and dozens of auxiliary
buildings were constructed. According to the sales brochure, the property
presented "an unmatched redevelopment opportunity."
But Jerry Hawkins, a vice president of CB Richard Ellis, said that
potential buyers proved to be more interested in the land than in the
buildings. So Decisions opted to sell the entire Biosphere site of 1,658
acres. The property "was offered unpriced," Mr. Hawkins said.
Decisions eventually received 11 bids, he said, and Fairfield Homes' offer
was not the highest. "Price was not the No. 1 issue for the seller,"
Mr. Hawkins explained, suggesting that Fairfield was open to discussions about
the Biosphere's future.
Mr. Hawkins would not say how much Fairfield is paying, but Mr. Bowen said
that Mr. Bass was more interested in finding "the highest and best
use" for the Biosphere than in recovering what he spent.
"Forget the money," Mr. Bowen said. "It's sunk money. What
matters is that it's a fantastic piece of equipment."
Beach trash frustrates
locals
Volunteers clean parks
following holiday weekend
BY JIM WAYMER
FLORIDA TODAY
The needle's shiny tip stuck out in an otherwise pristine sand dune at
Cocoa Beach. With white rubber-gloves, Vicky Croft placed the spent hypodermic
in a soda can.
"It's frustrating," Croft said as she and about a dozen other
volunteers with the nonprofit Keep Brevard Beautiful picked up Tuesday at Alan
Shepard Park in Cocoa Beach and Cherie Down Park in Cape Canaveral. They
scoured Brevard County beaches, garbage bags and grip claws in hand.
Medical waste, usually washed in from afar, is the tip of the trash heap.
Most of what they find drops from local hands in the shape of plastic food
and drink containers, beer cans, broken bottles and cigarette butts, you name
it.
The blight happens after each Memorial Day and every other big holiday
weekend, especially during tourist season. It's a dirty downside of a beach
economy and the bane of locals such as Rhonda Anderson, who sees a much
broader problem than she hears about at City Hall.
"I came out here because I'm really upset," said Anderson, a
smoker who lives in Cocoa Beach, where Mayor Skip Beeler recently called for a
smoking ban on the city's beaches.
"The cigarette butts are minimal," she said. "Eating causes
litter. Drinking causes litter. So what's he going to do, ban eating?"
She and the other volunteers described what they consider the much
larger problem: items that can gash feet, puncture fingers and entangle birds
and other marine life.
While health experts recommend calling local law enforcement or fire
department to remove hypodermics, they say
there usually aren't enough viable bacteria or viruses in a needle to cause
disease. Studies have found the odds of contracting HIV from a needle that
washes up on New York beaches, for example, is 1 in 15 billion to 1 in 390
trillion.
But other sharp things cause concern. Anderson found eight fishhooks on
fishing line the other day. Broken glass she once stepped on sent her to the
emergency room several years ago.
"Current society is not responsible for their own actions," she
said. "They're always blaming somebody else."
Who's to blame?
The post holiday trash problem stretches the length of Brevard's coast, and
after 10 years cleaning Indialantic's beach, Joe Chiscon knows whom to
blame.
"Once the kids get out of school, the beaches around here get
trashed," said Chiscon, a public works employee for the town.
"People blame the tourists, but it's not the tourists, it's the kids. The
tourists have more conscience than anyone."
He put fresh bags into garbage cans that had been filled by Tuesday-morning
good Samaritans and others through the weekend with runaway chip bags, empty
cola cups and other trash.
Larry Weber, executive director of Keep Brevard Beautiful, said beachside
trash has been worse in previous years when fireworks were permitted on the
beach.
Within about two hours Tuesday, the dozen volunteers at Alan Shepard Park
had filled about 50 large garbage trash bags.
"The point is, its not just cigarettes," Anderson said.
"It's everybody," Weber said.
Staff writer John Torres contributed to this report. Contact Waymer
at 242-3663 or jwaymer@flatoday.net.
When developers arrived, peace left
Once-tranquil Yankeetown is torn apart by a proposal to build a vacation
resort on the Withlacoochee.
By ELENA LESLEY
Published May 30, 2006
YANKEETOWN - This tiny town just north of the Citrus County line is
imploding.
For years, 600-plus people have lived undisturbed here, enjoying a quiet life
in a place where Town Hall closes at noon and the biggest thing that ever
happened was when Elvis showed up 45 years ago to film a movie.
But today, Yankeetown is far from tranquil.
A developer's plan to build a vacation resort along the shores of the
Withlacoochee River has plunged the hamlet into open warfare. Neighbors eye each
other with suspicion. Three of the town's five council members and a chunk of
the town's longtime staff have resigned as accusations of corruption fly and
meetings descend into ugly shouting matches.
Last week, state investigators started probing possible Sunshine Law
violations and alleged threats against town officials.
A group of residents is trying to recall the mayor. And some fear the town
could self-destruct any day, leaving Yankeetown under more lenient county codes.
"I've never seen a town so torn apart as this town,'' said new council
member Dan Bowman, who replaced a woman who resigned. "It's destroying
us.''
The battle for Yankeetown mirrors many similar fights up and down Florida's
Gulf Coast as developers clash with environmentalists and townspeople.
People live in Yankeetown because they like it the way it is: Narrow streets
lined with sabal palms. Lazy days on the water. A single general store where you
can get sandwiches and chicken, and if you order ahead, barbecued ribs.
The largely retired population came here to escape the sprawl of suburban
Florida.
Growth breeds growth, they say. Traffic, crime, demand for resources the town
doesn't have.
Still, the resort hotel has moved forward.
The disputed project - 135 resort hotel rooms, a bed and breakfast, spa,
cabana restaurant and wet and dry boat slips - cleared a hurdle during a
confused and raucous meeting two weeks ago, when the Town Council decided to
officially start negotiating with the developers.
The council achieved a quorum to approve the opening talks by bringing back a
member who had resigned, enraging already weary opponents.
"It was too orchestrated to be coincidental,'' said resident Ed Candela,
who has fought the development.
The fracturing of Yankeetown started in December, when word spread that two
developers were scouting out the town. Rumors simmered.
"We had people saying we were going to build 10-story condos, all kinds
of things,'' said Peter Spittler, a developer with Izaak Walton Investors LLC,
and one of the men who sparked the gossip.
As the resort plans filtered out, people got mad.
They got angrier when they learned the former town attorney worked for months
with developers on what town records dubbed "The Marina Project.''
As the rancor built, newly elected Mayor Joanne Johannesson told residents
she had "no idea'' why the proposed project had been kept secret.
A presentation from the developers in February didn't help matters.
As hundreds of residents from Yankeetown, and neighboring Inglis - where the
town mayor once issued a proclamation banning Satan -filled the local school
gymnasium, the suit-clad Spittler clicked his way through PowerPoint slides.
"We want to work with the community to create something unique," he
told the audience.
But few held back when the time came to ask questions.
"Have you ever sold snake oil?'' one resident wanted to know.
Outside, a protestor cavorted by the door in a devil costume, telling people
Satan had been driven out of Inglis and right into Yankeetown.
The stunts have added a comic touch to the debate, but there are serious
concerns - including that the resort could overwhelm the town's volunteer fire
department, which doesn't have a ladder truck.
Some also fear the new project will damage Yankeetown's unspoiled
environment.
"I'm very concerned about the manatees and increased boat traffic,''
said Helen Spivey, co-chairwoman of Save the Manatee Club, which has been
monitoring Yankeetown's battle.
The resort hotel centers around the Izaak Walton Lodge, which reopened in
2000 after fire destroyed the historic inn and restaurant. In development
designs, a bed and breakfast juts off from the main building, leading to a
waterfront resort and resculpted shoreline.
Spivey said the developers' plans to dredge the riverbanks could alter the
natural habitat and hurt animals that lay eggs in those areas.
"You can't just whack away at the shoreline,'' she said.
Residents fighting the development agree but say more than environmental
concerns are at stake. Namely, the future of Yankeetown.
"People who used to be friends are not talking,'' said Marinus De Rijke,
who resigned as acting chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
"They can't stand each other now.''
Town Council meetings are circuses that stretch for hours as residents hurl
insults at the council and each other.
At the mayor's request, a Levy County deputy attends meetings to escort out
rowdy residents.
A particularly determined antidevelopment group has mobilized under the
slogan "Save Yankeetown,'' blanketing the town with bright yellow T-shirts,
decals and yard signs. Angry residents rant on www.saveyankeetown.com, calling
their council a "Banana Republic'' and "Puppet Government.''
Sally Price, who contributes to the local paper, the Newscaster, has helped
lead the charge.
For months, Price wrote incendiary editorials for the Newscaster,
hand-delivering 250 copies each Wednesday to subscribers in Yankeetown.
Recently, she has backed off, saying she was threatened by other residents.
The controversy has taken its toll on others.
Council member Diane Blomgren, who resigned along with council member Roger
Myrick on May 11, said the stress has affected her health, causing her to drop
26 pounds. A few days after the council members quit, the town clerk of 17 years
and assistant town clerk also gave notice.
A recently hired zoning official now refuses to set foot in town, saying he
was intimidated by residents. He agreed to finish a few projects from the safety
of Citrus County.
Mayor Johannesson says she isn't stepping down, even though the recall
petition is gathering momentum and every day someone else accuses her of selling
out Yankeetown to the Walton group.
"The allegations are completely unfounded,'' she said. "I've never
been dancing with the developers.''
She says the turmoil is caused by the "NIMBY'' - Not In My Back Yard -
phenomenon.
Now, state officials may end up deciding the fate of the mayor, the resort
project and Yankeetown itself.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement said recently it was looking into
allegations made by residents, although FDLE spokeswoman Kristen Perezluha said
she couldn't reveal whether the department had started conducting interviews in
Yankeetown.
In a letter to the governor, dozens of Yankeetown residents pleaded for an
investigation "into the actions of our mayor, former mayor, majority of our
Town Council, former council, current & former zoning officer(s), &
group of developers that have been continuing in what we believe to be an
illegal manner, possibly a criminal conspiracy."
As she battles her neighbors, Johannesson has no illusions about the small
town she currently governs.
"It's an absolute mess.''
Poll Shows Voters Are Fed Up With Bay Area Growth
By KAREN BRANCH-BRIOSO kbranch-brioso@tampatrib.com
Published: May 29, 2006
TAMPA - Tonia Owen and her family moved to Brandon from Sarasota 11 years ago
to a neighborhood of green lawns and easy commutes. But that was then.
"We're about ready to move out of state. That's honest," said Owen,
42, a Denny's waitress and mother of five whose husband commutes to Bradenton
for work. "The roads can't keep up with nothing. … I feel the government,
all they care about is building more and more houses so they can get more and
more property tax."
Owen, who has no party affiliation, is one of 625 likely general election
voters surveyed May 19-23 by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research for The Tampa
Tribune. When it came to the question of restricting growth, political
affiliation didn't matter. Region didn't matter (voters were surveyed in
Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Polk counties).
Overall, 71 percent agreed that state and local government should do more to
restrict growth in Florida. The poll's margin of error was plus or minus 4
percentage points.
That opinion came from those whose professions benefit from growth as well.
Listen to Robert Tubb, 57, a Republican, who is a general contractor in
Lakeland: "What I don't like is the politicians all talk about the job
growth and it's good for everything, but we have one of the worst school systems
going. Everybody complains about overcrowding; it's caused because they can't
build the schools fast enough, plus all the infrastructure, the water -
everything - falls behind the growth. They have to limit it somehow. The roads
are horrible now."
Joseph Narkiewicz, executive vice president of the Tampa Bay Builders
Association, said that although public opinion may call for more restrictions on
growth, tough regulations exist - and some growth is impossible to stop.
He noted the passage last year of a far stronger statewide growth-management
law that will require local governments by 2008 to include school capacity in
their planning blueprints before proceeding with growth. Narkiewicz said
Hillsborough County's comprehensive plan and land development codes are 1,000
pages apiece.
"There are not only tremendous restrictions. The public has tremendous
opportunity for input on how growth is controlled or directed," Narkiewicz
said, noting that growth comes from three sources - births, international
immigration and migration from other parts of the country. "If we want to
stop growth, we have to sterilize everybody or have much better education on
family planning, or we stop all immigration, or we deny people the
constitutional right to freedom of movement and stop them at the state
line."
Ruth Fry moved to her waterside subdivision in Hudson from Atlanta eight
years ago. She is a Republican and strongly believes the government needs to
stay out of most issues. But she has seen the effect of growth in Pasco County,
and she sees a need for a stronger governmental role there.
"They should make sure we have all the support we need to make sure we
can handle the growth - the water, the sewer, the roads," said Fry, 55, who
makes candles for a living. "You go into all these subdivisions up in
Spring Hill, where there's supposed to be all of this reclaimed water available,
but some of my friends up there, their subdivisions don't have the water. You
can't believe all the building. It's crazy."
Much of that same sentiment comes from homeowners who see the changes
sprouting around them, such as William Bauers of Pinellas Park. The retired
schoolteacher moved into his home 28 years ago and is eyeing the townhouse
projects being built nearby
"I'm being surrounded," said Bauers, 78, a Democrat. "If we
have more people, then it taxes everything: the police, fire, garbage pickup. We
have traffic problems now, and when they put these [condominiums] in, it's going
to tax our infrastructure greatly. I thought we should have more control."
Reporter Karen Branch-Brioso can be reached at (813) 259-7815.
Traffic, sprawl top woes in survey
The Seminole poll found support for improving roads and saving rural areas.
Robert PeRez | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted May 29, 2006
Seminole County residents are generally happy with their government, but a
significant number think rapid growth is threatening their quality of life, a
survey found.
Three of four residents want to adopt protections for rural areas, according to
the survey.
The survey of 625 registered voters was commissioned by Envision
Seminole, a nonprofit community group that helps local governments identify and
develop initiatives to improve the community. The results were shared with
government officials at a meeting Thursday.
Traffic is considered the biggest problem in the county, with 33 percent of
those surveyed listing it as what they least like about living here. Growth,
sprawl and overdevelopment came in second with 15 percent.
That surprised some who see the county's road-building program, funded by an
additional penny sales tax, as one of the strongest in the region.
"Our citizens approved the sales tax and made roads a priority," said
Deputy County Manager Don Fisher. "We understand how important it is. But
it's very difficult to keep up with growth."
The survey found that 65 percent of respondents think taxes are about as
expected, while 22 percent said they are too high.
One city manager said the impact of growth and development is a common problem
across Central Florida, but there is little government can do to stop it.
"People do have property rights," Lake Mary City Manager John Litton
said.
That's why the survey's overwhelming support for rural preservation is easier
said than done, he said.
"Sooner or later, it will all be developed," Litton said. "That's
why we have to develop in a reasonable manner. Once it's developed, it's
developed. That's why we try to negotiate a deal that minimizes the impact as
much as possible."
A portion of the survey that looked at community needs confirmed the public's
concern with traffic and growth. Controlling traffic and improving roads was
rated "very important" or "somewhat important" by 98 percent
of respondents. Controlling growth and development rated very or somewhat
important for 96 percent.
The phone survey drew its sampling from registered voters and was balanced
according to demographics. The respondents reflected the male and female mix and
racial and ethnic mix in the county. The margin of error in the survey was plus
or minus 4 percentage points.
The survey, "Assessment of Community Priorities," was conducted by
Cookson Research Consulting.
Robert Perez can be reached at rperez@orlandosentinel.com or 407-322-1298.
Development, pollution
muddying Florida's historic Silver Springs
By KELLI KENNEDY
Associated Press Writer
SILVER SPRINGS, Fla. (AP) -- Hovering over a patch of murky water and tangled
swamp trees, a dozen tourists peer through the floor of a glass-bottom boat,
hoping to glimpse a passing turtle, a bowfin or maybe even the mysterious
creature from the black lagoon.
But the once crystalline water that made Silver Springs the state's first
tourist attraction is now clouded by a thick, brownish sludge. The algae, a
byproduct of burgeoning nitrate levels, clings to the eelgrass, making it
difficult to glimpse sea life in their brilliant turquoise limestone home.
Now environmentalists fear the pollution will get even worse. They say that
if the state doesn't act quickly a new development that will house 22,000
residents will raise nitrate levels even higher, polluting the springs
irrevocably.
"It's very depressing. This is one of the largest springs in the world
and perhaps the best known and to see it in decline like this is very
disheartening," said Jim Stevenson, a former biologist with the Department
of Environmental Protection and chairman of the Florida Springs Task Force.
Long before tourists flocked to Walt Disney World, they made their pilgrimage
to central Florida to marvel at the pristine spring that pumps about 516 million
gallons a day to the Oklawaha River. Silver Springs is the state's third largest
spring and the largest aboveground spring.
As a child, environmentalist Guy Marwick used to swim and canoe in the cool
waters, which stays 72 degrees year round. He remembers the spring's glory days,
when the site was a haven for Hollywood filmmakers and National Geographic
specials.
Six "Tarzan" movies were filmed there, along with the
"Creature from the Black Lagoon," "The Yearling" featuring
Gregory Peck,and the 1960's TV series "Sea Hunt" starring Lloyd
Bridges.
Now the only reminder of that period, is a mammoth, algae-strewn statue - a
leftover prop from the TV show "I Spy." Grounded at the mouth of the
cave, where water spews from the recharge basin, workers have to scrub the prop
every few weeks to keep up with the fast-growing gunk.
The algae isn't just ugly to look at - environmentalists say it's choking the
spring's vegetation, contributing to the demise of the ecosystem.
"It's sickening. It's just very sad to see what used to be white snail
shell and sand. It's a dramatic change," said Guy Marwick, an activist with
the Smart Growth Coalition of North Central Florida and former curator of the
Silver River Museum. "We've seen several plants all but disappear."
Silver Springs has also seen about a 95 percent decline in its fish
population since the 1950s, said Dr. Bob Knight, an environmental scientist for
the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Florida DEP.
Although Knight said nitrate levels are almost three times what they were in
the 1950s, he's not convinced they are the sole cause of the fish deaths - but
they're certainly having an effect.
The nitrates create the algae, which "could be having some effects on
the fish and the invertebrates. It's definitely having an effect on the plant
community," Knight said.
Nitrate levels are rising at dangerous levels largely because of development.
"But it's all kinds of development - agricultural, septic tanks,
fertilizer, storm water, waste water - all those things combined create a
nitrogen load," he said.
Knight knows halting development is unrealistic in Florida's popular real
estate market. He advocates smarter development - stricter storm water rules
from the county and more stringent nutrient removal in wastewater discharge on a
state level.
But environmentalists say there's no way the 4,436-acre development that
Avatar Properties Inc. is proposing won't adversely effect Silver Springs. The
Coral Gables-based group, set to break ground in 2008, also sits on a vital
recharge area for the springs - about one mile away at the closest point.
The recharge area is made of extremely porous limestone, which soaks up
nitrate-polluted rainwater like a sponge, Stevenson said.
"All the groundwater in the 1,200 square mile Silver Springs recharge
area flows to Silver Springs," Stevenson said. "The rain that falls in
the area closest to the springs may be able to get there in days. The rain that
falls several miles away, may take decades."
In other words, if the Avatar property is built, all the pollutants will
eventually trickle to the springs in a matter of time.
According to the Florida DEP the Avatar property is on the "A list"
of the Florida First Magnitude Springs Project.
"We are currently working with Avatar and it is something that we are
very interested in acquiring," said Sarah Williams, a spokeswoman with DEP.
"It's a priority project."
If the state can't afford to buy the entire parcel of land, Avatar has
indicated "they are open to selling parts of it," Williams said.
She would not say when the state might make an offer.
But the locals are getting antsy. A March 26 Ocala Star-Banner editorial
urging the state to act quickly, headlined "Avatar Land:Time is
Money."
The state offered to pay $22 million for the land in 2004, but Avatar
rejected the deal. But it is willing to consider a better offer.
"If the amount was correct then the company would sell. If not we would
continue on with our development and permit of the project to build a community
up there," said Avatar attorney Dennis Getman.
He said Avatar also wants to preserve the springs and has pledged to grow
vegetation and lawns that don't require a lot of fertilizer. They've also
promised to spend an additional $50 million on a storm-water runoff system to
help protect the basin.
"We do not want to develop the property in a way that would cause damage
to the springs," Getman said.
Homes vs. habitat at center of Volusia land decision
Ludmilla Lelis | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted May 29, 2006
PORT ORANGE -- Developers and environmentalists are locked in familiar tug of
war over a 450-acre stretch of oak and hickory hammocks, stands of slash-pine
trees and a small black-water stream that flows toward the sandy bluffs of
Volusia County's Spruce Creek.
But there's a twist to this contest, one that asks the governor and Cabinet to
approve plans for a massive retail and housing development on land that they
have already voted to try to buy for a nature preserve.
Three years ago, they tagged the land as an environmental gem and
placed it as a priority purchase under the environmental land-buying program,
Florida Forever.
On Wednesday, the governor and Cabinet must decide whether to approve a special
government district on that same land to finance its development.
The decision could put Florida officials in the middle of a bidding war for the
coveted property.
Its future as homes or wildlife habitat is still up for grabs. The developer
controlling the land, influential home builder Mori Hosseini, is ready to build
Woodhaven, his latest subdivision, but he says he is open to selling.
Meanwhile, environmentalists are closely watching the Cabinet's decision, as
well as any other move that could affect the preservation effort.
"What nobody wants is for any government action to raise the value of a
property that the state is trying to acquire," said Clay Henderson, an
attorney and president of the Friends of Spruce Creek. "That's just sound
public policy."
The land itself sits directly east of Interstate 95 and borders the 2,000-acre
Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve, one of the few remaining large natural areas
that hasn't been gobbled up by the sprawling cities of east Volusia.
The preserve's namesake was a sculptor and an artist who once pulled out a map
and outlined the acreage she wanted to protect. She included the 35-foot-high
bluffs overlooking the creek, the Indian mounds and the 18th-century ruins of
the failed Andrew Turnbull colony, which was Britain's largest attempt to
colonize the Americas.
A 23-year effort to assemble the preserve has largely succeeded, Henderson said,
with help along the way from several cities, Volusia County, The Nature
Conservancy and the state's land-acquisition programs.
Completing the Spruce Creek preserve is still a priority for the state and
Volusia County. The remaining parcels, including the 450-acre tract in play at
the moment, are listed as must-buy properties for both Florida Forever and the
complementary land-buying program Volusia Forever.
The Cabinet agreed that parcel belongs in the preserve boundaries in February
2003, and the state Department of Environmental Protection tried to buy the land
later that year, reportedly for $6,000 an acre.
Richard Schattie, a West Palm Beach real-estate broker who represents the
longtime landowners, said that offer was soundly rejected.
"They made a ridiculously low offer that wasn't acceptable," said
Schattie, who represents the Stanaki Partnership, made up of two West Palm Beach
brothers.
They got the right price from Hosseini, founder of ICI Homes and a prominent
Volusia developer who ranks among the top-50 home builders in the nation.
Hosseini secured a five-year contract to gradually buy all of the Stanaki land,
which totals nearly 1,300 acres and straddles both sides of I-95.
He would not disclose the purchase price for the land, but public records show
that a 244-acre section on the west side of the highway cost $4.2 million, or
more than $17,000 per acre.
With purchase rights on the remaining land -- including the 450 acres --
Hosseini has already forged ahead with his plans for Woodhaven, where he is
proposing nearly 3,000 homes and 2.3 million square feet of commercial space,
with several parks and miles of trails.
"It's a beautiful piece of property, and we are planning to do a very
different development, more of a green subdivision with traditional
neighborhoods, porches on the front and garages in the back, and soccer and
football fields," Hosseini said.
To finance his plans, his company is asking the Cabinet to approve a
community-development district, which can levy tax-exempt bonds for $52.5
million to pay for water, sewer and stormwater utilities, as well as roads.
An administrative-law judge reviewed the proposed district and wrote that the
plan passes legal muster. The only problem he foresaw is whether approval of the
community-development district could conflict with the state's attempts to buy
the 450 acres desired for the Spruce Creek preserve, according to the report.
The Cabinet does have the leeway to vote against the
community-development district, said Michael Allan Wolf, a University of Florida
law professor with expertise in land-use planning.
"Florida is a leading state in the preservation of historic and
environmental land, and the argument could be easily be made that allowing the
CDD would frustrate state-preservation plans," Wolf said. "That could
be a legitimate argument that could be used to modify the proposal."
Henderson said the district could easily be approved for the 800-plus acres on
the west side of the interstate not wanted for the preserve.
Hosseini said Wednesday's Cabinet vote won't affect his plans either way,
explaining that a community-development district would only make it easier to
finance some of the recreational improvements he wants.
"People think if the Cabinet rejects it, we won't develop, but far from
it," Hosseini said. "We will develop the property."
But he said he is willing to negotiate for a preservation deal.
"We have to do what's right for the community, and if the state and county
feel it's crucial, absolutely we could sell," he said.
"Then it comes down to the price."
Ludmilla Lelis can be reached at llelis@orlandosentinel.com or 386-253-0964.
Facing reality on global warming
By Times editorial
Published May 30, 2006
A group backed by the oil and auto industries has a curious response to An
Inconvenient Truth, former Vice President Al Gore's new movie about global
warming. In the documentary film, which is little more than a lecture
accompanied by stunning pictures, Gore makes a case for why increased carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions linked to human activity are threatening the
planet.
The movie, which has gotten mostly positive reviews, warns of the
consequences of persistent warming of the planet - particularly more powerful
storms, melting of the polar ice caps and worldwide flooding. Included is an
impassioned (yes, Al is capable of passion) plea for action.
"This is not so much a political issue as a moral issue," he says.
"Our ability to live is at stake."
We're not sure why anyone would continue to deny the fact of global warming.
There is irrefutable scientific evidence that it is happening. As for solutions,
there is room for debate. But how could anyone deny that a reduction in our
profligate use of oil - mainly through conservation and alternative fuels -
would be anything other than a good thing?
The Competitive Enterprise Institute can, in a series of slick 60-second
television spots that would be humorous if they weren't so blatantly insulting
to our intelligence. One ad, labeled "Energy," features pictures such
as a little girl blowing on a dandelion while a soothing female voice says:
"The fuels that produce CO2 have freed us from a world of backbreaking
labor" (flash to a peasant in the fields). "Now some politicians want
to label carbon dioxide a pollutant. Imagine if they succeed. What would our
lives be like then?"
The answer that comes to mind is, "We would be facing reality." But
the CEI, which is funded by ExxonMobil among others (Ford distanced itself from
this campaign), has a different ending: "Carbon dioxide. They call it
pollution. We call it life."
See for yourself at www.cei.org, where you can view the ads. We don't
recommend a steady diet of CO2. They call it life. We call it unhealthy.
[Last modified May 30, 2006, 06:08:05]
Once Vital in Fighting Fires, Spotter Towers Now Obsolete
By Gary
White
The Ledger
LIVING GLIMPSES OF EARLY FLORIDA
part of a periodic series
Fire towers have been used to detect fires in Florida at least since the state
created the Division of Forestry in 1927. In their prime, they numbered more
than 200. This series explores historic ways of life that
persist into the 21st century.
When Joshua Dyer became a forest ranger five years ago, he was thrilled to
learn his workplace included a penthouse suite of sorts. Dyer was assigned to a
parcel of land in Northwest Polk County that includes a 100-foot tower topped by
a cubicle-sized room.
"I like having it here; it's kind of a landmark," Dyer said of the
structure known as the Green Swamp Tower to its owner and Dyer's employer, the
Florida Division of Forestry. "I used to go up there just about every day
when I was first hired on. It's a good place to sit with a cup of coffee."
These days, though, the tower no longer serves even the reduced function of a
personal breakfast nook with a 20-mile view. The structure, one of just a few
remaining fire towers in Polk County, has become a mere relic, a quaint reminder
of bygone times.
Florida relied for decades upon a network of tall towers occupied by spotters to
help detect wildfires and send crews to fight them.
But the need for fire spotters began to wane as development replaced forests in
previously desolate parts of Florida, and advances in communications further
lessened the towers' importance in the 1990s, as residents with cell phones
became unofficial sentinels for woodland fires.
"We have a plane that flies the district if we're having a lot of lightning
activity," said Eddie Gilmore, senior ranger with the Division of Forestry
in Lakeland. "It's much more cost-efficient to do that than pay someone to
sit in a tower all day."
The Green Swamp Tower, standing along U.S. 98 about 10 miles north of Lakeland
Square, now projects a rather forlorn aura. Rotting hunks of wood dangle from
some of its 132 steps. An antenna remains attached to the tower's roof, though
the radio inside is long gone. And the spotting booth's only regular occupants
these days are colonies of wasps.
In NASA parlance, Polk's fire towers have been abandoned in place.
"They've become obsolete for us," Gilmore said. "Eventually they
will be taken down; I'm not sure how long that will take. It's kind of
sad to see them go."
TOWERS AND CROW'S NESTS
High platforms have been used to detect fires in Florida at least since the
state created the Division of Forestry in 1927, said Ira Jolly, chief of the
state's Forest Protection Bureau. An inventory from 1932 found 22 towers in the
state, as well as nine "crow's nests" -- platforms mounted on tall
pine trees with spikes serving as steps.
Jolly said the early towers were made of wood and probably stood 75 to 100 feet
tall, while the crow's nests were 45 to 70 feet high.
The towers became taller, more secure and more plentiful in the following
decades. At the time of its construction in 1963, the Green Swamp Tower was a
crucial addition to Florida's fireprotection network.
The towers, numbering more than 200 in their prime, yielded panoramic vistas and
were situated so that their visual ranges overlapped to give full coverage.
The Green Swamp Tower was originally erected near U.S. 98 and Rock Ridge Road,
about 2.2 miles south of its current location. Forest rangers moved it in 1990,
breaking it into three sections so it could be hauled by heavy truck and
reassembled.
Polk's other towers can be seen near Frostproof, Indian Lake Estates, Bradley
Junction and Lake Pierce.
For decades, the towers were staffed by full-time spotters, who often lived on
the premises for quick access to the 8-foot-by-8foot perches, or
"cabs."
The spotters' tools included an alidade, a sundial-like instrument used to
describe the location of a fire. A dispatcher, plotting coordinates reported by
two or more towers on a map, could produce fairly precise directions for
firefighters in those days before global positioning systems.
Fire spotting, despite its initial appeal, could quickly become lonely and
monotonous, said Gary Zipprer, manager of the Division of Forestry's Lakeland
District.
"I first started as a ranger and spent about a week up there, and it was
about the hardest job I ever had," Zipprer said. "If there wasn't
something going on, it was extremely boring up in an 8by-8 box. And on windy
days, it would sway back and forth. For those of us who have a hard time sitting
still, it was hard.
"I've heard of one person who went up for an hour and called on the radio
and said, `I quit,' and left the keys on the desk."
PHASING OUT FIRESPOTTERS
The state began phasing out full-time firespotters in the 1990s, and the last
positions disappeared in 2001, though some rural districts still use rangers or
part-time employees as spotters during the fire season -- spring and early
summer. Zipprer said Polk's fire spotters either moved to northern districts,
took new jobs or retired.
"It was a sad day to lose those folks because some of them were long-term
employees," Zipprer said.
One of his employees in the district headquarters served as a spotter for
years before being forced to take an office job. She declined to speak about her
time as a spotter, her tone of voice suggesting the phaseout remains a painful
subject.
After eliminating the full-time fire spotters, the Division of Forestry decided
not to pay for the maintenance of towers in some districts, including the Polk
area. Gilmore said the agency hasn't replaced the boards of the towers' stairs
and landings in at least seven years, and the structures are no longer
considered safe.
Towers are still maintained, though not actively staffed, in some northern and
rural counties. One such tower stands along State Road 33 in Lake County, just a
few miles north of the border with Polk. Division of Forestry officials said
that tower has already proven valuable during this spring's outbreak of
wildfires.
Though officially retired, the Green Swamp Tower still gets occasional use. Dyer
said he and others carefully ascend its stairs -- using the metal rails to avoid
the rotten wood -- to help with missing-persons searches, scout for poachers or
assist firefighters from other agencies. Dyer most recently scaled the tower
about six months ago to toss a bug bomb inside the cab, which was swarming with
wasps.
From the cab, Dyer can see as far west as a gypsum pile north of Plant City and
as far north as a set of phone towers near Polk City. He said the southern view
extends beyond downtown Lakeland, though the city lacks a landmark tall enough
to be seen from that distance.
Dyer said the tower sometimes draws would-be tourists, including occasional Boy
Scout leaders who say they climbed its stairs as boys and would like to repeat
the experience with their troops. The ranger is forced to turn them away.
Dyer, 29, points out that all of Polk's fire towers, each anchored deep in the
ground by four concrete feet, survived the hurricanes of 2004 without noticeable
damage. And, he notes, the wallunit air conditioner in the Green Swamp Tower
still blows cold.
The Kathleen High School graduate expresses nostalgia for the days before he
became a ranger, when the fire towers were more than mere totems. He holds out
hope the Green Swamp Tower might be restored, and he said at one point a local
landowner seemed interested in paying for repairs to the steps, though that
prospect has dimmed.
"I don't want it to go," Dyer said. "I hope they keep it here at
least as a landmark."
UNCERTAIN FATE
The fate of Polk's fire towers is as uncertain as a parched forest during fire
season. The Division of Forestry regularly puts towers up for sale -- sometimes
with their surrounding properties -and state records show about 65 have been
disposed of since the early 1980s.
Ed Kuester, the Tallahassee official who manages surplus equipment for the
Division of Forestry, says any buyer must cover the cost of moving a tower and
filling the holes left by the concrete footers.
"They're not a big moneymaker by any means," Kuester said. "I
think the most I ever heard bid on one was $1,000."
The land occupied by towers, of course, can fetch a much higher price.
The towers often go to other government entities. Kuester said a port commission
from Louisiana has expressed interest in buying towers from Florida to replace
communication and security structures destroyed by last year's hurricanes.
At least one tower has already vanished from the landscape in Polk County.
Zipprer said a structure that stood near Eloise Loop Road in Winter Haven was
dismantled and sold several years ago after the Division of Forestry lost its
lease on the surrounding land.
Another Polk tower has passed into private hands. The Davenport Tower, located
northeast of the Interstate 4-U.S. 27 junction, now belongs to Ritchie Bros.
Auctioneers, which bought the former Division of Forestry property a few years
ago.
None of the five remaining Polk towers is on the list of properties up for bid,
though Kuester said that could change at any time.
It's not clear how many towers the Division of Forestry still owns. Jolly, the
chief of the Forest Protection Bureau, said the state is in the midst of an
inventory, and he wouldn't even offer an estimate.
Jolly insisted the towers aren't necessarily headed for extinction. State
officials suggest some municipalities or historical organizations might step in
to preserve towers, though Ed Etheredge, a past president of the Polk County
Historical Association, said he doubted local historical preservationists would
direct their scarce funds toward such a project.
The best hope for the towers' future might rest with Washington, D.C. Jolly said
his department has applied to the U.S. Forest Service for a federal grant that
could be used to preserve some of the structures.
"We feel it's important to keep representation of these towers up as, if
anything, a memorial or monument to that part of our history of fire
protection," Kuester said. "We're kicking around (the idea of) one per
county, or one per district, so people could always see the way it used to be
done."
Gary White can be reached at gary.white@theledger.com
or at 863-802-7518.
River shrimpers say
their catches are getting smaller
By KELLY CUCULIANSKY
The Daytona Beach News-Journal
OAK HILL, Fla. (AP) -- A dolphin's fin peeks above the moonlit waters of the
Indian River as a shrimp net is lowered into the northern flowing tide.
Elmo Keeton moves quickly on the crowded deck of his pontoon boat, stepping
over ropes and scooting by a big white holding tank.
It's a few minutes past midnight as the 71-year-old stares into the water,
waiting for a shrimp catch he doesn't have much faith in anymore.
"Worst year I've ever had," said the Kentucky native, who has been
shrimping in the area for 11 years. This night's run, cut short by a lost
anchor, lasted about two hours and yielded only enough white shrimp for a humble
cocktail.
Keeton and other river shrimpers think something is amiss and they have their
own theories. While some wildlife officials have noted a decline in the amount
of bait shrimp being caught in recent years, they're not sure why.
Whenever wild shrimp are caught and sold in Florida, that information is
supposed to be reported to the Fish and Wildlife Research Institute in St.
Petersburg.
"We know what (the shrimpers) tell us, which often is an incomplete
picture," said research administrator Joe O'Hop. "But actually, they
know a lot about what's going on in the water."
Though numbers are at least a month or two behind, O'Hop said his data shows
a decrease in the amount of bait shrimp taken from inland waters between St.
Augustine and Sebastian Inlet the past several years. For example, in 1998 about
45,285 pounds of shrimp were caught in 834 trips, while in 2005 about 8,290
pounds were caught in 199 trips.
"I can't tell if it's environmental problems or just disruptions to the
general level of harvest," O'Hop said. "I haven't heard anything
specific."
The lower numbers in recent years could be due to hurricanes, cold snaps or
rising fuel costs driving shrimpers away from the market, O'Hop said.
A hundred pounds of bait shrimp in four hours - considered a good catch - is
worth $200 to $300, Keeton said. But those nights are memories. He said a
20-pound catch, worth maybe $50 to $70, is bad for a night of shrimping. With
the price of gas, boat upkeep, permits and licensing fees, Keeton said
"anything lower than that is just a break-even deal."
Keeton, a part-time Oak Hill resident who shrimps commercially to supplement
his retirement income, said he used to be able to make about $8,000 per season
dipping bait shrimp. But this year, he predicts his earnings will be about
$1,000.
Standing on his boat, dip net in hand, Keeton remembered how the profitable
little crustaceans used to pile into the mesh. They would swim right into it,
making a heavy, happy haul to swing into his holding tanks. But now it's a game
he can't figure out.
"Nobody can predict these shrimp," he said.
Even the full moon doesn't help anymore. He said the five days before and
five days after a full moon, the tide usually runs faster and higher, rolling
shrimp into his nets. His favorite shrimping spot, close to Oak Hill's River
Breeze Park, used to be one of the best sites around. But one group agrees with
Keeton that they've seen a dramatic drop in the number of shrimp this year.
Lucky Johnson, a spokesman for the Internet Shrimpers and Anglers
Association, an organization of mainly east central Florida members, blames the
decline of inshore shrimp on commercial offshore shrimpers near Ponce Inlet who
are wiping the sea clean before the shrimp are able to spawn.
"These shrimp are getting caught before they ever have a chance,"
said the Deltona resident. "The only explanation for it is those shrimp
boats."
Johnson, 52, who said he has been shrimping since he was old enough to hold a
dip net, said five years ago he could catch at least three to five gallons of
shrimp per night. "The last three or four years, it's like, 'OK, will I get
enough for dinner?' "
Soon it will be too hot to catch shrimp. Once the water temperature warms to
75 degrees, the shrimp tend to stay beneath the sand in cooler areas, Johnson
said, and they won't appear again until mid-September.
There are many factors that can affect shrimp and each group will have its
own perspective, said Anne McMillen-Jackson, an associate research scientist at
the Fish and Wildlife Research Institute. While she has not heard of troubles in
the Indian River, she said Johnson's theory may not be too farfetched. Adult
shrimp live, mate and lay eggs offshore, but spend most of their juvenile lives
in estuaries.
"The offshore fisheries are targeting the adults," she said.
"If you did fish the adults before they spawn, then you could affect the
number of juveniles in the estuaries."
A lack of rain also can affect the salinity of the water and juvenile shrimp
tend to thrive in less salty areas.
"If you're having a drought, you're going to tend to have higher
salinity," she said.
The Southeastern Fisheries Association, with 450-member companies that
include harvesters, packers, processors, marine suppliers, exporters and charter
boat businesses, hasn't noticed a decline in the shrimp population, said Bob
Jones, the group's executive director. But what local shrimpers are reporting is
not an uncommon phenomenon.
Because the life span for most shrimp is about a year, one year's crop might
not prosper because of environmental changes such as salinity, temperature or
water quality, Jones said. But next year could yield "more shrimp than you
know what to do with."
Though it's gotten harder to net a decent catch each year, Keeton said he
will continue to chase shrimp. It's something to eat, it's something to share
and "it's just something to keep you out of trouble," he said.
As the pontoon boat chugged back to the dock after a useless night, Keeton
said he's giving it up for a while to spend time at Lake Erie pursuing another
passion - freshwater fishing.
He'll be back in October though, waiting to see what the full moon might
bring.
Altering Of Site Plans Discussed
By SUSAN M. GREEN sgreen@tampatrib.com
Published: May 27, 2006
BRANDON - Some residents want the county to give developers less
flexibility to change what is detailed in site plans offered for public review
on rezoning applications and approved by elected officials.
Developers, however, told county commissioners last week they already are
having so much trouble getting rezonings and permits in Hillsborough that they
are funneling more work to neighboring Pasco and Manatee counties.
The opposing views were aired Thursday at the first of two public hearings
on proposed changes to Hillsborough County's land development code. Another
hearing before county commissioners is scheduled for 6 p.m. June 15 in the
commission boardroom at County Center, 601 E. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa.
Ana Shaffer, of Brandon, co-chairwoman of UNDO (United Neighbors, Dedicated
Opposition), said she volunteered for more than two years as a member of a
county-assembled committee charged with recommending changes to Hillsborough's
planned development ordinance.
She said she supports requiring developers seeking a planned development
rezoning to specify building sizes and locations, parking areas, buffers,
drainage and other details for public review and sticking to the plans that
are approved.
Shaffer said she also wants the code to clarify how residents who are
unhappy with county staff-approved changes to a project can appeal.
She said local residents recently felt shut out of the process in the case
of a development at the southwest corner of John Moore Road and Bloomingdale
Avenue. She said a county zoning official approved changes to the project
after it received zoning approval, and neighbors could not find a way to
appeal.
Others, including Terry Flott of the Seffner Community Alliance, said
community organizations, as well as adjacent property owners, should receive
notice of such changes.
Reporter Susan M. Green can be reached at (813) 657-4529.
Solid Waste Manager Discourages New Wells Around Landfill
By YVETTE C. HAMMETT yhammett@tampatrib.com
Published: May 27, 2006
SEFFNER - If it were up to one county official, no new wells would be dug
within a few hundred yards of any federally designated hazardous waste site in
Hillsborough County.
That includes the Taylor Road Landfill Superfund site in Seffner, which has
an underground plume of polluted water looming beneath it.
"With the growth potential in the area, there is a potential to alter
groundwater flows ... and cause the contaminants to migrate," said Dave
Adams, an environmental manager with the Hillsborough County Solid Waste
Department.
For now, the plume remains stable. But new wells might move the plume and
taint water going into homes for drinking and bathing.
Adams monitors a number of former hazardous waste sites designated by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as Superfund sites, including the Taylor
Road Landfill.
After spending a couple of years working with the county's Environmental
Protection Commission and Seffner residents, he's been given the go-ahead to
hook up seven rural homesteads near the landfill to the county's water supply.
As soon as they pay their $55 deposits, Buster Bean Drive residents will be
eligible for county water and can stop using their wells for drinking water.
With that accomplishment behind him, Adams said he hopes to convince others
wishing to develop near the old landfill to avoid digging wells altogether.
For several years, Seffner activist Cam Oberting pushed the county to
provide municipal water hookups, free of charge, to the seven homes on Buster
Bean Drive, just west of the landfill.
With the help of Adams and EPC General Manager Andy Schipfer, a deal was
struck in October 2005. It will cost the county less money to hook up the
homes than for Adams to continue monitoring the wells for contamination year
round, he said.
"We're not doing this because we're obliged," Adams said.
"It's being done to reduce well monitoring and to save money."
The county Solid Waste Department can use the $18,000 it saves on
monitoring costs to pay for the hookups, Adams said.
And that's good enough for Oberting. She praised both Adams and Schipfer
for working hard to accomplish the task.
"I have worked on this issue for three years," she said.
"And now it's there for them."
So far, two homeowners have submitted their refundable deposits. Adams said
he wants to get all the applications in before meters are installed and pipe
is laid, but he hopes to complete the project before the end of July.
The landfill, located just north of Interstate 4 between County Road 579
and Taylor Road, was designated a Superfund site by the EPA in 1983.
A federal remediation plan required the county to install a ring of wells
around the dump's perimeter to monitor the polluted underground plume. The
plan also called for the county to supply municipal water to homes in the
area.
While Buster Bean residents fell just outside the remediation area, at
least one of the private wells on the road has shown high levels of acidity in
samples taken over a period of time, Adams said.
Buster Bean homeowners still can use their private wells for irrigation.
But Adams said he hopes no more wells will be approved nearby.
The fewer pumps pulling water from the aquifer near the polluted plume, the
better, he said.
Because the Buster Bean Drive area is outside the county's urban service
area, landowners are not automatically eligible for county water hookups.
To get county water service, landowners must get a letter from Solid Waste
demonstrating that there is a potential for well contamination.
Then, it is up to Hillsborough County Water Resource Services, formerly the
Hillsborough County Water Department, to authorize the hookup.
"I want it to be known that installation of wells in that area is not
a good idea," Adams said. "I'm trying to beat the drum louder."
Recent water samples taken near the Lazy Days RV Resort on CR 579 highlight
his point. "We're seeing things, volatile compounds" in the test
samples, Adams said, which could mean the polluted plume has shifted slightly.
But the jury is still out and the investigation continues, he said.
The recent drought may be exacerbating the situation, Adams said. As more
water is pulled from the underground aquifer, the plume is more likely to
migrate.
Reporter Yvette C. Hammett can be reached at (813) 657-4532.
Field-of-dreams plan for site blocked
By NATHAN CRABBE
Sun staff writer
Phil Emmer had a rude awakening over his field of dreams.
The Gainesville developer proposed creating a "Great American Park" at
U.S. 441 and NW 53rd Avenue, building state-of-the-art athletic fields and
elaborately landscaped gardens. He pledged $1 million of his own money and
started collecting the millions more needed for the project.
Home Depot's recent announcement it would buy the land has effectively quashed
those plans. The company has pledged to sell 76 of the 92 acres to the city of
Gainesville for a nature park, but Emmer's vision isn't being considered for the
site.
The city is asking Florida Communities Trust for $4.8 million to fund the
purchase, though Gainesville officials expect the land to be bought for less.
Emmer said the land has been overvalued and the city won't have any money to
make improvements to the site.
"I just think we aren't getting our money's worth," he said.
Gainesville Mayor Pegeen Hanrahan said such an undeveloped swath of land in the
city will only increase in value. She said Home Depot will use the piece of land
appropriate for extensive athletic facilities, leaving soccer fields and passive
recreation for the remainder.
"It's really not appropriate for any kind of development," she said.
Wal-Mart had proposed on the site a nearly 300,000-square-foot development
including a retail and housing complex and supercenter. But Gainesville city
commissioners narrowly rejected the proposal in 2004, finding it conflicted with
the site's hydrologic features.
The land includes the headwaters of Hogtown Creek, which runs through
Gainesville before draining into Haile Sink. Home Depot's plan differs in the
fact it would be about half the size and placed within an old driving range
already zoned for commercial development.
The Alachua Conservation Trust prepared the city's application for the
conservation funds, but won't know for months if the application was approved.
Robert "Hutch" Hutchinson, the trust's project manager, said it would
hold a two-year option on the land.
That will ensure the land isn't developed even if state money isn't approved
this year, he said. He said everyone would have liked to go forward with Emmer's
park vision on the entire site, but Home Depot ended those thoughts.
"We all wanted this to happen and tried to stay out of the way until it was
clear he wasn't going to come to terms," he said.
Emmer said he'll still pursue plans to build athletic fields elsewhere. The area
needs such facilities more than just nature trails, he said.
"I don't really know if we need any more conservation land in
Gainesville," he said.
Saving water, one sheet at a time
Kelly Griffith
Sentinel Staff Writer
May 30, 2006
Putting crisp new sheets on hotel beds every single day of Florida vacations
wastes billions of gallons of water in laundries, state officials say.
Area restaurants, likewise, each spray tens of thousands of gallons needlessly
down the drain washing dishes when a $40 fix would conserve the precious
commodity without compromising clean dishes.
Despite a state program aimed at promoting "green lodging," which
urges cutting down on hotel laundry, retrofitting restaurant sinks to be more
water-friendly and a bevy of other conservation measures, only six area lodging
properties have met the state's criteria for the designation. All are
Disney-owned resorts.
Potential water savings in the Orlando market if all area hotels participated
and guests complied with the laundering schedule: 1.43 billion gallons of water
per year.
Resistance comes in part, state officials say, because hotels fear patrons'
perceptions. Cutting back on services would be intolerable to many. In the
industry, hospitality is everything.
"I want my slick sheets every day," said tourist Byron Graham of
Mississippi, staying at the Quality Inn on Interstate 4 near Davenport last
week. His family visited Walt Disney World and was en route to Savannah, Ga., on
vacation. "I want them washed every day. Yes, every day."
His wife firmly agreed.
That, conservation experts say, is one of the tallest hurdles: challenging
travelers' expectations. Sometimes saving for years for a family vacation, many
people are unwilling to give up the demand to be pampered, said Patty Griffin,
president and founder of the Green Hotels Association, a Texas-based nonprofit
that promotes conservation practices and provides members with educational
literature.
State officials concur.
"There is a mentality on the part of a tourist that 'I'm paying $300 for a
room; I should be able to use as many towels as I want to,' " said Bruce
Adams, water-conservation officer for the South Florida Water Management
District, whose jurisdiction includes the tourist corridor of southwest Orange
and north Osceola counties.
Its westward counterpart, the Southwest Florida Water Management District, which
governs water use in Polk County and areas toward Tampa, is promoting a similar
program that zeroes in on linen and towel washing. The agency offers
participating hotels educational literature and door hangers that explain the
program to guests, which includes an every-third-day laundering schedule unless
instructed otherwise by guests.
Education crucial
Educating guests is the key to making it work, Griffin and others said. A
customer such as Graham, who had $16,000 in damage to his home from Hurricane
Katrina, comes from a state where water-supply issues aren't often in the news.
Most people who come to Florida have never heard of the Floridan Aquifer and may
have no idea there is a water shortage, considering they see marshes, beaches
and lakes all around.
With a captive audience in the hotel room, the industry has an opportunity to be
educators, said Griffin, who added that business travelers take to such programs
more easily than tourists.
"Most people don't do linens every day at home," said Mike Molligan, a
Southwest Florida management district spokesman.
Seventy-one hotels in the Tampa-St. Petersburg area saved 100 million gallons in
one year after beginning the program, according to a local-government study in
2002-03.
Laundry costs for a hotel can drop up to 30 percent, helping reduce operating
costs by $1 per occupied room per day, according to program officials. Guests
sometimes use up to 300 gallons per room per day, although most average about
150 gallons daily, water-management officials said.
The expected savings of washing linens and towels every three days is about 50
gallons per room each day.
So far, more than 200 hotels in the Southwest Florida district's 16-county
region, which includes Polk and part of Lake, are signed up for the Water
Conservation Hotel and Motel Program, or "Water CHAMP." The St. Johns
River Water Management District does not have a similar program, and the South
Florida Water Management District participates only in the state's Green Lodging
program. That, however, involves many other things in addition to laundering
schedules. Issues with air quality, lighting, pollution, staff training and
other issues come into play before the state's Green Lodging certification is
granted.
Slaves to hospitality
The six-room Heritage Country Inn in Ocala has been participating in the
Southwest Florida laundering program for six or seven months.
Tanja Gross, who helps operate the inn owned by her in-laws, said the inn has
about 50 percent participation from guests on rehanging towels. No one ever
complains about washing linens every third day, she said.
Because the inn is on well water, she isn't sure how much water it has saved.
"Some of them [guests] don't pay attention or don't care and still just
throw the towels down," she said. "But about half of them hang up the
towels and want to reuse it again."
Hoteliers are slaves to hospitality, Griffin said, and if guests tell hotel
managers they appreciate the conservation efforts and don't perceive them as a
"lack of" anything, they will listen and do more, she thinks.
Eateries face scrutiny, too
Restaurants also are in the cross hairs of water managers looking for ways the
tourism industry can save water.
Officials in the South Florida water district, the area covering the tourist
corridor, said countless gallons of water are being wasted when restaurants wash
dishes.
They plan to rewrite the guidelines used to dole out grant funds, recommending
that hotels and restaurants have the spray valves in their dishwashing areas
retrofitted with a lower-flow version. That could save 77,000 gallons of water
per year on each valve and up to $1,000 yearly in water bills for the average
restaurant. It's not uncommon for a restaurant to have two or three spray valves
and a hotel to have three or four in its kitchen.
The cost to make the change for each valve: $40.
"These are things that cost next to nothing," Griffin said.
Added Adams: "Eighty percent of people say they are environmentalists, but
how can they do that? I think this helps make the 80 percent of people who say
they are environmentalists prove it."
Kelly Griffith can be reached at kgriffith@orlandosentinel.com or
863-422-5908.
Make mine rare, as in a dinner downtown
Dinner in downtown Brooksville is still hard to come by. One historian
says it's been that way for about 40 years. Theories abound but the reasons
are still unclear.
By MICHAEL KRUSE
Published May 30, 2006
BROOKSVILLE - About a month ago, Debbie McCallister, the owner of the
downtown restaurant called Maw's Vittles, looked at her empty tables in the
evenings and made a decision on her weekday dinner hours. No can do. So the
country cookin' place at the corner of Broad Street and Mildred Avenue now is
open for dinner on Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays, and no longer on
Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays.
Chalk it up as another dinnertime defeat in downtown Brooksville.
The shift at Maw's rekindles an often-asked question around here: Why can't a
guy or a gal get a bite to eat in this town's two- or three-block center anytime
after 5:01 p.m.?
"I don't know," City Manager Richard Anderson said . "That's
an enigma."
"If you're talking about lunch," new Brooksville redevelopment
coordinator Joe Murphy said, "you can fill your belly every day and be very
happy about it."
"But Brooksville's not a dinner town," said Lisa Miller, a co-owner
of the Rising Sun Cafe, the year-old coffee shop on Main Street.
"Brooksville's a breakfast and lunch town, period, and there's no getting
around it."
Folks here in the Hernando County seat used to be able to get dinner right
downtown at the Florida Cafe and the Tangerine Grill.
Ye Olde Fireside Inn was a nice place, but it burned down a year and a half
ago, and it wasn't really downtown, anyway - "downtown," for purposes
of this debate, being defined loosely as walking distance from the courthouse.
Mykonos II has some good food, and so does Luigi's, and Papa Joe's, and
John's Corner Restaurant and Victoria's Steakhouse, but they're not downtown,
either.
"If you're talking about sit-down, genuine dinner restaurants directly
around downtown, there really hasn't been anything for 30 or 40 years,"
said Bob Martinez, the local historian who publishes Old Brooksville In
Photos & Stories.
At Maw's, McCallister makes stick-to-your-stomach sorts of stuff like
meatloaf, chicken and dumplings and plates of fish with hush puppies. Groups of
seniors come at their regular times for their regular breakfasts. The grits are
good.
For dinner, though, most of the time the business isn't enough to support
gas, electric and payroll.
"I can't understand it," McCallister said. "I've tried
everything."
Ads in mailed-out coupon books. Free tea. Even free wine.
The new dinner hours include all-you-can-eat catfish for $7.95 on Friday
nights and all-you-can-eat spaghetti Saturdays and Sundays for $5.99.
Meanwhile, on State Road 50 on the other side of the Suncoast Parkway, a soup
and a salad and a beer plus a tip can run up quickly to 15 bucks at Ruby
Tuesday. Down the road at Johnny Carino's, and on U.S. 19 at Chili's, Outback
and Red Lobster, get in line and wait for a table. Even on weekdays.
Downtown Brooksville?
Nothing.
Except theories.
Some say there's not enough parking.
Others point to real estate gone too high.
Murphy, the redevelopment coordinator, thinks it's because the SR 50 truck
route takes too many potential customers around the city instead of through it.
And then there's the intangible that always has to count for something
here. Tradition.
"I believe that Brooksville is more of a hometown place," said
Miller from the Rising Sun. "People want to be home in the evenings with
their families."
"The government center draws a lot of activity during the day,"
said Mike McHugh, the director of the county's Office of Business Development.
"Translating that activity in the evening and on weekends is one of the
many challenges for the downtown area. How do you get that energy? There's no
easy answer."
No formula, either, said Aaron Allen, the chief executive of the Orlando-area
Quantified Marketing Group, a consulting firm for the restaurant industry. Where
to put restaurants is a decision based on a number of factors, including traffic
counts, demographics, cost of real estate and closeness to competitors.
but really," Allen said, "it comes down to an individual
approach."
Brooksville grew very little in the 1980s and 1990s, and the population is
still around 8,000, but that's about to change. In the last five years,
Brooksville has grown from 5 to 10 square miles due to annexation, according to
Bill Geiger, the city's community development director. Homes are being built in
big new developments like Hernando Oaks, Majestic Oaks and Southern Hills, and
folks who buy nice homes in those spots are going to want good little
restaurants where they can eat out and spend money, right?
"Maybe a good seafood restaurant, maybe a little glass of red
wine," said Martinez, the historian. "I think that would do well. I
live downtown. So I'd love to see that happen."
"As long as it's good food for a decent price, a fair price, and with
good service, people will come," Brooksville real estate agent Robert
Buckner said.
But a restaurant has to come first.
"And they all need somebody to validate the demographics," said
Anderson, the city manager. "They all want someone else to be
first."
As for the early returns on the changed dinner hours at Maw's?
"Not too good," McCallister said Saturday. "Even slower."
Michael Kruse can be reached at mkruse@sptimes.com
or 352 848-1434.
[Last modified May 30, 2006, 01:09:11]
A City's Search For Its Soul
By CHRISTIAN M. WADE cwade@tampatrib.com
Published: May 29, 2006
PORT RICHEY - It's the most densely developed retail corridor in west Pasco,
a mile-long stretch of asphalt, shopping centers and belligerent motorists.
Welcome to Main Street, Port Richey, otherwise known as U.S. 19.
It's not much to look at right now, but city officials have big plans to
transform the ultra-congested thoroughfare into a picturesque gateway to this
small waterfront community.
A beautification project will add palm trees, landscaping and even a
"Welcome to Port Richey" sign along the highway median. A $150,000
grant from the state Department of Transportation will pay for it.
Vice Mayor Phyllis Grae has worked with DOT officials to secure funding, and
local landscaping architect Margaret Moore is the designer.
The landscaping will stretch from Grand Boulevard to Ridge Road and will
include clusters of greenery on two "triangles" in the median, Grae
said.
"It's going to look beautiful. She [Moore] really has an eye for
it," the vice mayor said.
The forlorn strip of yellowing grass is long overdue for a facelift, she
said.
And that's just for starters.
The U.S. 19 project is part of a broader effort by city officials - working
with an Orlando-based architectural firm - to define the soul of this city,
carved out of the wilderness by citrus farmers and cattle ranchers more than a
century ago.
"We've got a blank canvas to work with," City Manager Jerry Calhoun
said. "We can be Key West-style or Mediterranean-style. We have a range of
possibilities to explore."
Known for its retail stores and outlets, Port Richey often is mistaken by
tourists and even area residents for its larger and more populous neighbor, New
Port Richey.
A lack of signs leaves some guessing where one begins and the other ends.
Unlike New Port Richey - which has an old-style Main Street with historic
buildings, wide sidewalks and picture-window storefronts - Port Richey has never
had a downtown.
Calhoun said the lack of a defined center can work to the city's advantage.
"The one good thing about not having a downtown is we're starting from
scratch and can create whatever we want," he said. "We don't have to
build around it."
Possibilities for redevelopment are endless, he said.
The civic heart of Port Richey has always been difficult to identify. Some
say it's west of U.S. 19, near the mouth of the Pithlachascotee River. Others
say it's Ridge Road, where city hall is flanked by gun and pawn shops and liquor
stores.
This search for identity is complicated in a city where folks are more likely
to run into friends and neighbors at the Wal-Mart Supercenter or Gulf View
Square mall.
In the early days, when Port Richey was little more than an expanse of family
farms and sandy roads, most thought of New Port Richey as downtown.
Now, the "Little City by the River" finds itself trying to shatter
its image as a retail rest stop for motorists bound for somewhere else.
To accomplish that, city officials have enlisted landscape architects and
designers from Bellomo-Herbert and Co. Inc.
Redeveloping the waterfront overlay district will be a challenge.
"That's where we'll definitely need some help," Grae said.
"Personally, I'd like to take a bulldozer, knock it all down and start
over. It looks like a shantytown."
Christian M. Wade can be reached at (727) 815-1082.
Rulings Unfair Burden On Property Owners
Published: May 28, 2006
Writing a bill that becomes solid law in Florida isn't always
simple. When disputes arise over a law's meaning, purpose or effect, the court
system is often called to interpret it, which can result in precedent-setting
case law or prompt lawmakers to go back to the drawing board for more
specifics.
But sometimes the courts lose sight of the big picture. A perfect example
are rulings that have thwarted legal challenges to the proposed Cypress Creek
Town Center, a development of regional impact that is to include a
1.3-million-square-foot mall on what is now pasture and other undeveloped land
along State Road 56 and Interstate 75 in Wesley Chapel.
A couple of weeks ago, a state appeals court upheld, without even a written
opinion, a Pasco circuit judge's ruling that dismissed three property owners'
lawsuit challenging the enormous project. Circuit Judge W. Lowell Bray and the
2nd District Court of Appeal agreed the property owners have no
"standing" to sue.
Although it's reasonable to conclude that one owner, who lives a mile or so
from the project site, didn't meet the requirements to sue, it's very
troubling that judges who reviewed the matter ruled two other property owners
had no standing, either. Those residents, Bob and Shirley Jones, live on
Cypress Creek Road, along the creek and right across from where the mall would
be built. If they have no legal standing to challenge the county's decision to
allow the project, it's highly unlikely anyone does.
In December, Bray ruled that the couple failed to show they will
"suffer adverse effects" from Cypress Creek Town Center and thus
didn't have standing. The ruling was made even though the couple cited the
impact to wetlands they benefit from - 50 acres will be destroyed - as well as
the 100-year floodplain they share with the project site and the loss of
wildlife and habitat they enjoy, among other points. Shirley Jones also noted
that area traffic is "bumper-to-bumper" now - without the mall.
What more should they have shown?
Clearly, state law and case law put too much burden on affected property
owners who are at the mercy of developers and the projects they build. And, it
is important to stress, this involves obviously affected property owners just
establishing the right to challenge a government decision in court and has
nothing to do with prevailing.
The law and the court system are complicated, but the decision barring the
Joneses from challenging the process is unfair and chilling. The big picture
is that 500 acres of tranquil, open land is on its way to becoming a massive
development with a huge asphalt parking area - and the Joneses will be at its
doorstep.
At the very least, they should have the right to mount a full challenge to
protect their quality of life.
Project to add water to aquifer
The county will create underground storage for rainy season runoff from
Lake Tarpon to later go for landscape watering.
By THERESA BLACKWELL, Times Staff Writer
Published May 30, 2006
EAST LAKE - Uncorking three wells in the Brooker Creek Preserve is not the
only idea Pinellas County has for increasing the supply of water available to
irrigate the landscape.
A few miles west of the preserve, another innovative water supply project is
under way just south of Brooker Creek in John Chesnut Sr. Park.
Pinellas County Utilities has received a permit to create an underground
reservoir for water that would otherwise flow from Lake Tarpon into Tampa Bay
during the rainy season.
Instead of spilling over the flood control gate into the Lake Tarpon Outfall
Canal, the water would be diverted for storage. It would be treated and injected
225 to 320 feet below ground and float like a bubble in the brackish surrounding
water.
Then, in dry times, the water would be withdrawn to irrigate yards.
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection issued a permit for the
subterranean reservoir, known as an aquifer storage and recovery project.
The county will build a full-scale demonstration project over the summer,
said Pick Talley, county utilities director, and start testing. Then officials
should know how much water can be stored and pulled back out during a drought,
he said. They are hoping to recover 1-million gallons per day of a suitable
salinity for watering plants.
"It will allow us to expand the reclaimed water system," said
Talley. "The more reclaimed water you use, the less potable water you
use."
Talley said the project was suggested by the Southwest Florida Water
Management District, also known as Swiftmud.
"We get 60 percent of our rainfall between June and September,"
Swiftmud spokesman Michael Molligan said. "If you can find ways to capture
that water and store it for later use, that's beneficial for everyone."
Funding for the project totals about $3.3-million, he said. That includes
about $1.5-million each from Swiftmud and the county, and a state grant of
$340,000.
Swiftmud, the Department of Environmental Protection and others will be
reviewing test results. Molligan said no adverse impact will be allowed.
St. Petersburg has a somewhat similar project in testing. But the water the
city is storing there is reclaimed from treated effluent.
One concern officials have, St. Petersburg Water Resources director Patti
Anderson said, is whether the reclaimed water stored underground will mix too
much with the brackish water that surrounds it. If so, she said, "it might
not be suitable for landscape."
Largo looked at aquifer storage recovery and decided against it, said
Assistant City Manager Norton Craig.
"We have 18-million gallons of storage space in three tanks (for
reclaimed water)," he said. "It's meeting our needs for now."
Clearwater has tested the feasibility of aquifer storage and recovery at its
northeast plant, but test results showed the salinity of the water underground
was not suitable. Andy Neff, Clearwater's public utilities director, said
officials probably won't do any further testing at other sites for now.
The county also is moving toward an aquifer storage project at the South
Cross Bayou water reclamation facility on 54th Avenue N in St. Petersburg. The
permit application has not been submitted yet.
Initial testing in John Chesnut Sr. Park looked good, officials said, so they
are going ahead.
"The estimated seasonal storage capacity is between 60- and 120-million
gallons a year," said Dave Slonena, county hydrogeology manager.
The water will be filtered and then disinfected with a technology new to the
county. Ultraviolet light from fluorescent bulbs will kill bacteria and
pathogens, he said, before the water is injected underground.
If the East Lake well can provide 1-million gallons a day when needed,
officials said, the county may seek permits to triple the program with two more
wells.
County May Add To Shrimping Gains
By MORGAN C. MOELLER Hernando Today
Published: May 29, 2006HERNANDO BEACH - Each night,
shrimpers take a gamble.
They gamble on whether they'll bring in enough shrimp to break even with
the rising cost of gas.
They gamble on whether they'll be able to navigate a narrow, shallow
channel with only the moon to light their way.
They gamble with their lives.
But something has come along that takes the risk out of shrimping. And
soon, it will come to Hernando County.
Aquaculture.
It is exactly what it sounds: fish farming - in this particular case,
shrimp farms.
Steve Giese owns two shrimp hatcheries and a third farm location.Two of the
locations are in Florida - one in the Panhandle and one on the East Coast -
and soon, he plans to open a farm right here in Hernando County.
The project has been in the works since Giese moved here 12 years ago. With
shrimp farming in mind, Giese moved to Hernando because of its temperate
climate, which facilitates shrimp farming, and because he loved the area.
Giese, who owns Today's Fresh Catch Inc., operates his Texas and Florida
farms from his office in Hernando Beach. One day soon, he also will run his
Hernando farm from the same office.
The farm's design is complete, the resources are available - all that's
left to do is find a place to put it.
As far as Capt. John Saittis is concerned, it can't come soon enough.
Hernando County already is the largest producer of bait shrimp in the state,
Saittis said. The county also has established a reputation for itself for
exporting live eating shrimp to places such as Boston and New York. But with
shrimp farms factored into the equation, the local industry could garner even
more acclaim.
"If we can get that off of the ground, I can see Hernando County
becoming the state's largest exporter of seafood," Saittis said.
"This is going to revolutionize the way bait shrimp is going to be
supplied to the industry," Giese said. "The great thing is that this
is not going to hurt the boat industry."
Gators and Sharks Are Overrated
By NATHAN CRABBE
New York Times Regional Newspapers
GAINESVILLE -- Fatal alligator and shark attacks have been big news in Florida
during the past few years.
But there's an animal 300 times more dangerous, despite its innocent face and
bushy white tail.
There's an average of 130 fatal vehicle collisions with deer in the United
States each year, according to statistics kept by the International Shark Attack
File at the Florida Museum of Natural History in Gainesville.
By comparison, on average, there was less than one shark attack and one gator
attack per year during the 1990s.
George Burgess, director of the shark file, said he keeps such statistics to put
shark attacks in perspective. He said recent fevered news media coverage of
three fatal gator attacks reminded him of fatal shark attacks getting blown out
of proportion in years past.
"It's really nice to see an animal other than sharks get abused for a
change," he said.
Experts say humans have little to fear from most wildlife. There have been no
reported fatal bear attacks in Florida and no reports of wildlife bites giving
Florida residents a fatal case of rabies in decades. Just six of the 49 species
of snakes in Florida are venomous and potentially deadly.
"People tend to blow things up and think they're going to get killed, but
it doesn't happen that often," said Anni Bladh, the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission's nuisance-animal biologist for the region.
Bladh said most of the calls she gets are from people who spot raccoons in
daylight and think they're rabid.
Alachua County has treated nine people for rabies this year and 38 last year
after they were bitten by raccoons and other animals, said Paul Myers, director
of environmental health for the county.
But the effectiveness of those treatments and widespread vaccination of pets has
virtually eliminated rabies deaths in people, he said.
"The cases are sporadic across the United States," he said.
People have even less to fear from Florida's black bears, said Walter McCown, a
biologist with the wildlife commission who studies the animals. Bears are very
shy and have never attacked someone unprovoked in this state, he said.
He said people should keep food inside to prevent bears from being attracted to
their homes, but shouldn't worry about fatal bear attacks.
"Dogs regularly kill people, and we tend to accept that risk," he
said.
Snakes are another story. About 150 people are bitten by snakes in Florida each
year and, on average, one of those bites results in death, according to the
wildlife commission.
Last year, Putnam County Fire Marshal Joe Guidry shot a diamondback rattlesnake
t